qPCR vs. dPCR: Which Technology is Right for Your Lab?

Introduction

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Digital PCR (dPCR) are two of the most advanced nucleic acid detection techniques used in molecular biology, diagnostics, and research. Both technologies rely on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify DNA or RNA, but they differ significantly in methodology, data analysis, and applications.

qPCR is widely used for real-time quantification of nucleic acids, offering fast results and high-throughput capabilities, while dPCR provides absolute quantification and enhanced precision, especially for detecting low-abundance targets. Choosing between these technologies depends on your lab’s research objectives, sample types, and sensitivity requirements.

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of qPCR and dPCR, detailing their principles, advantages, limitations, and ideal use cases to help you determine the best technology for your lab.

Understanding the Basics: How qPCR and dPCR Work

What is qPCR (Quantitative PCR)?

qPCR, also known as real-time PCR, is a powerful tool for detecting and quantifying nucleic acids in real time. The amplification process is monitored using fluorescent dyes or probes, allowing for quantification of DNA or RNA during each cycle of the reaction.

How qPCR Works:

Amplification & Detection – During thermal cycling, fluorescence signals are generated as target DNA or RNA is amplified.
Real-Time Quantification – Fluorescence intensity is measured at each cycle, enabling the calculation of relative or absolute nucleic acid amounts.
Ct (Cycle Threshold) Analysis – The cycle at which fluorescence surpasses a predefined threshold correlates with the initial target concentration.

qPCR is ideal for applications requiring rapid and relative quantification, such as gene expression analysis, pathogen detection, and genotyping.

What is dPCR (Digital PCR)?

dPCR is a more recent advancement in PCR technology that partitions the sample into thousands of tiny reactions, each containing zero, one, or a few copies of the target DNA. After amplification, positive and negative reactions are counted to determine absolute quantification.

How dPCR Works:

Sample Partitioning – The DNA sample is divided into thousands of individual micro-reactions (droplets, wells, or chambers).
Amplification & End-Point Detection – Each reaction is amplified independently, and fluorescence is detected at the end of the process.
Absolute Quantification – The number of positive partitions is used to calculate the target concentration without needing a standard curve.

dPCR is particularly useful in applications requiring high sensitivity and precision, such as rare mutation detection, copy number variation analysis, and liquid biopsy research.

Key Differences Between qPCR and dPCR

Feature	qPCR (Quantitative PCR)	dPCR (Digital PCR)
Quantification Type	Relative (requires standard curve)	Absolute (no standard curve needed)
Sensitivity	High, but limited by background noise	Ultra-high, ideal for low-abundance targets
Precision & Reproducibility	Good, but can be affected by PCR efficiency variations	Excellent, due to absolute quantification
Throughput	High (up to 96- or 384-well plates)	Moderate (limited by partitioning capacity)
Dynamic Range	7–10 log	5 log
Data Analysis Complexity	Requires normalization and standard curves	More straightforward absolute quantification
Error Susceptibility	More variation due to amplification efficiency	Low error rate, robust for complex samples
Applications	Gene expression, pathogen detection, SNP genotyping	Rare mutation detection, copy number variation, low-abundance pathogen detection

When to Choose qPCR vs. dPCR

When to Choose qPCR:

qPCR is the better choice for labs requiring:

✔ High-throughput workflows – Capable of running hundreds to thousands of samples in a short period.
✔ Gene expression studies – qPCR is widely used for relative quantification of gene transcripts.
✔ Pathogen detection – Detects viruses, bacteria, and fungi with fluorescence-based real-time quantification.
✔ SNP genotyping – Useful for detecting known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).
✔ Cost-effective testing – qPCR instruments and reagents are generally more affordable than dPCR.

The Avam® Real Merase™ qPCR System is designed for efficient, high-throughput qPCR applications, offering rapid thermal cycling, intuitive software, and precise fluorescence detection.

When to Choose dPCR:

dPCR is the better option when your lab requires:

✔ Ultra-sensitive detection – Can detect rare mutations with frequencies as low as 0.001%.
✔ Absolute quantification – No need for a reference or standard curve, making results more precise.
✔ Low-abundance target detection – Essential for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), viral RNA, or rare alleles.
✔ Copy number variation analysis – Accurately measures changes in gene copy number without normalization.
✔ Greater reproducibility – Reduces variability caused by PCR efficiency fluctuations.

The Avam® Digital Merase™ dPCR System offers a fully automated workflow, high precision, and the ability to process up to 32 samples per run, making it ideal for clinical and research applications that require absolute quantification.

Factors to Consider When Choosing Between qPCR and dPCR

To determine which technology best suits your lab, consider the following:

1. Sensitivity Requirements

If your research involves rare mutation detection, low-copy-number genes, or circulating DNA, dPCR is the superior choice.
If sensitivity is important but not critical, qPCR may be sufficient.

2. Throughput and Workflow Efficiency

qPCR is better suited for high-throughput screening, allowing rapid quantification of hundreds of samples.
dPCR has lower throughput but excels in precision and accuracy.

3. Data Analysis and Interpretation

qPCR requires careful normalization, use of standard curves, and efficiency calculations.
dPCR provides direct quantification without standard curves, reducing analysis complexity.

4. Cost and Instrumentation

qPCR instruments, reagents, and consumables are generally more affordable than dPCR.
dPCR is more expensive but provides superior precision and reliability for challenging applications.

5. Application Focus

For routine diagnostics, gene expression, and microbial quantification → Choose qPCR.
For rare mutation detection, absolute quantification, and liquid biopsy applications → Choose dPCR.

Conclusion: Making the Best Choice for Your Lab

Both qPCR and dPCR offer powerful capabilities, but the choice ultimately depends on your specific research needs. If your work demands high throughput, rapid analysis, and relative quantification, the Avam® Real Merase™ qPCR system is the best fit. However, if absolute quantification, precision, and low-abundance target detection are critical, the Avam® Digital Merase™ dPCR system is the optimal choice.

Whether you need a robust, high-throughput qPCR platform or an ultra-sensitive dPCR system, Avam offers cutting-edge solutions to meet your laboratory’s demands. Explore our range of Real Merase™ and Digital Merase™ systems to find the perfect fit for your molecular biology applications.

Want to Learn More?

Schedule Consultation

Featured Products

Real Merase™ qPCR System

The Avam ® Real Merase™ qPCR system is cutting-edge technology targeting high-precision quantitative PCR applications. Combining the best technology with user-friendly features ensures world-class performance and reliability for the modern laboratory. Whether it's research in genomics, diagnostics, or molecular biology, the Real Merase™ qPCR system offers you the tools to arrive at correct results reproducibly.

Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page Show more